4.7 Article

Treatment adherence in bipolar I and schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type

Journal

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
Volume 151, Issue 3, Pages 1003-1008

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.08.026

Keywords

Schizoaffective disorder; Bipolar disorder; Adherence to treatment

Funding

  1. Instituto de Salud Carlos III
  2. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitivity
  3. Miguel Servet Research Contract [CP06/0359]
  4. Spanish Ministry of Health
  5. CIBERSAM
  6. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation
  7. Instituto Carlos III [CP08/00140]
  8. FIS [PI12/00910]
  9. [CM11/00163]
  10. [PI07/1278]
  11. [PI10/02622]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Poor adherence rates in Bipolar Disorder type I (BDI) and Schizoaffective Disorder, bipolar type (SAD) may be high This study was aimed at comparing the clinical correlates of adherence to treatment and the course of illness in BDI and SAD patients. Methods: 75 SAD and 150 BDl DSM-IV outpatients were included. Adherence was assessed on the basis of patients' and care-givers' reports and serum levels, when available. Socio-demographic, clinical and treatment variables were collected and compared between diagnostic subsamples and then between goodly and poorly adherent patients. Multiple logistic regressions were performed, controlling for diagnostic subsample differences, to identify correlates of adherence in BDl and SAD groups. Results: Poor adherence was highly prevalent both in BDl (32%) and in SAD patients (44%), with no significant differences between diagnostic categories. Presence of psychotic symptoms (p=0.029), higher number of manic relapses (p < 0.001), comorbidity with personality disorders (p=0.002), and lithium therapy (p=0.003) were associated with poor adherence to treatment. Diagnostic subgroup analyses showed different predictive models, with the BDI poorly adherent subsample being more likely to include comorbid personality and manic recurrences and the SAD poorly adherent subsample being less clinically predictable. Limitations: The cross-sectional nature of the study limits de capacity to ascertain the direction of the relationship between certain variables. Conclusions: Rates of poor adherence to oral treatments are similar in SAD and BM. BDl patients with comorbid personality and substance use disorders are likely to be poorly adherent. Treatment adherence may be more difficult to predict in SAD patients. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available