4.7 Article

Characteristics and profiles of bipolar I patients according to age-at-onset: Findings from an admixture analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
Volume 150, Issue 3, Pages 993-1000

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.05.026

Keywords

Bipolar disorder; Age-at-onset; Admixture analysis; Affective disorder

Funding

  1. Sanofi-aventis, CNS Department, Paris, France

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Many studies have used admixture analysis to separate age-at-onset (AAO) subgroups in bipolar patients, but few have looked at the phenomenological characteristics of these subgroups, in order to find out phenotypic markers. Methods: Admixture analysis was applied to identify the model best fitting the observed AAO distribution of a sample of 1082 consecutive DSM-IV bipolar l manic inpatients who were assessed for demographic, clinical, course of illness, comorbidity, and temperamental characteristics. Results: The model best fitting the observed distribution of AAO was a mixture of three Gaussian distributions. We could identify three AAO subgroups: early, intermediate, and late age-at-onset (FAO, IAO, and LAO, respectively). Patients in the FAO subgroup were more often single young males exhibiting severe mania with psychotic features, a subcontinuous course of illness with substance use and panic comorbidity, more suicide attempts, and temperamental components sharing hypomanic features. Patients with LAO showed a less severe picture with more depressive temperamental components, alcohol use and comorbid general medical conditions. A less typical phenotype was present in IAO patients. Limitations: The following are the limitations of this study: retrospective design, and bias toward preferential enrollment of patients with manic predominant polarity. Conclusions: This study confirms that bipolar l disorder can be subdivided into three subgroups based On AAO distribution and shows that patients from these subgroups differ in phenotypes. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available