4.7 Article

Peritraumatic tonic immobility predicts a poor response to pharmacological treatment in victims of urban violence with PTSD

Journal

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
Volume 107, Issue 1-3, Pages 193-197

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2007.07.015

Keywords

post-traumatic stress disorder; tonic immobility; treatment outcome; violence

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Tonic immobility is the last defense against predation in animals and is characterized by paralysis and analgesia. In humans, it has only been reported in women victims of sexual abuse. Objective: This study evaluated the prevalence of peritraumatic tonic immobility (PTI) in patients with PTSD and investigated its association with response to treatment. Method: Victims of urban violence with PTSD diagnosed through the SCID-IV (n-23) underwent a naturalistic pharmacological treatment according to the recommended guidelines for PTSD. The Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist - Civilian Version (PCL-C) and the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Severity scores were applied at baseline and endpoint. PTI was assessed using the Tonic Immobility Scale. Results: PTI was reported by both genders in 43% of the sample. Patients with PTI responded significantly poorly to treatment than those without it, either considering the PCL-C or the CGI scores. Limitations: This study probed PTI retrospectively and was based on a small sample recruited in a tertiary clinic. Conclusions: We have expanded the scope of the two previous investigations on PTI by showing its occurrence also in men and during non-sexual violence. In addition, the finding of a significant relationship between PTI and poor response to treatment of PTSD indicates that PTI may carry a prognostic value in this disorder and suggests that PTI should be routinely assessed in traumatized patients. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available