4.6 Article

Prevalence and risk factors of metabolic syndrome in the Korean population - Korean National Health Insurance Corporation Survey 2008

Journal

JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING
Volume 69, Issue 7, Pages 1549-1561

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jan.12013

Keywords

Korea; metabolic syndrome; nursing; older adults; risk factors; younger adults

Categories

Funding

  1. Wonkwang University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim To determine the factors affecting the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in younger and older Koreans. Background Metabolic syndrome, in combination with other, interrelated predisposing factors, is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease. In Korea, the prevalence of this syndrome, like those of other chronic diseases, has increased continually in recent years. Design This is an analytic, descriptive cross-sectional study. Methods This survey targeted 690,283 examinees that had undergone a medical examination on a life transition period performed by the National Health Insurance Corporation from January-December 2008. For the purpose of this study, the diagnosis of metabolic syndrome was based on the criteria of the American Heart Association and the Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. The relationship between the risk factors and prevalence rate was shown using a multiple logistic regression model. Results The prevalence of metabolic syndrome was 248% in the 40 year olds and 408% in the 66 year olds. Among the younger adults, the prevalence in women was only 057times that in men. A multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated that heavy obesity and family history of cardiovascular disease are the strongest independent predictors of metabolic syndrome among younger and older Koreans. Conclusion As a management strategy, a nursing intervention strategy for the improvement of lifestyle factors including self-care through proper diet and exercise should be developed and implemented.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available