4.1 Article

Accuracy of the Welch Allyn SureSight for measurement of magnitude of astigmatism in 3-to 7-year-old children

Journal

JOURNAL OF AAPOS
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages 466-471

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2009.08.013

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Eye Institute of the National Institutes of Health [U10 EY13153]
  2. Department of Health and Herman Services
  3. Research to Prevent Blindness

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PURPOSE To evaluate the accuracy of the Welch Allyn SureSight in noncycloplegic measurements of astigmatism as compared to cycloplegic Retinomax K+ autorefractor measurements of astigmatism in children from a Native American population with a high prevalence of high astigmatism. METHODS Data are reported for 825 3- to 7-year-old children with no ocular abnormalities. Each child had a Retinomax K+ cycloplegic measurement of right eye astigmatism with a confidence rating >= 8 and 3 attempts to obtain a SureSight measurement on the right eye. RESULTS SureSight measurement success rates did not differ significantly across age or measurement confidence rating (<6 vs >= 6). Ninety-six percent of children had at least 1 measurement (any confidence), and 89% had at least 1 measurement with confidence at the manufacturer's recommended value (>= 6). Overall, the SureSight tended to overestimate astigmatism. If the SureSight measurement had any dioptric value (0.00 D to 3.00 D), astigmatism of 2.00 D or less was likely to be present. If the SureSight showed astigmatism beyond the instrument's dioptric range (>3.00 D), Retinomax K+ measurements indicated that >2.00 D of astigmatism was present in 136 of 157 (86.6%). In cooperative children for whom the SureSight would not give a reading, 32 of 34 (94%) had >3.00 D of astigmatism. CONCLUSIONS The SureSight does not provide an accurate, quantitative measure of amount of astigmatism. However, it does allow accurate categorization of amount of astigmatism as <= 2.00 D, >2.00 D, or >3.00 D, and it has high measurement success rate in young children. (J AAPOS 2009;13:466-471)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available