3.8 Article

PREDICTION MODELS OF SARCOPENIA IN JAPANESE ADULT MEN AND WOMEN

Journal

Publisher

JAPANESE SOC PHYSICAL FITNESS SPORTS MEDICINE
DOI: 10.7600/jspfsm.59.291

Keywords

Sarcopenia; Japanese; Reference value; Prediction equation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this study was to develop prediction models of sarcopenia in 1.894 Japanese men and women aged 18-85 years Reference values for sarcopenia (skeletal muscle index. SMI, appendicular muscle mass/height(2), kg/m(2)) in each sex were defined as values two standard deviations (2SD) below the gender-specific means of this study reference data for young adults aged 18-40 years Reference values for predisposition to sarcopenia (PSa) in each gender were also defined as values one standard deviations (1SD) below The subjects aged 41 years or older were randomly separated into 2 groups, a model development group and a validation group Appendicular muscle mass was measured by DXA The reference values of sarcopenia were 6.87 kg/m(2) and 5.46 kg/m(2), and those of PSa were 7.77 kg/m(2) and 6.12 kg/m(2). The subjects with sarcopenia and PSa aged 41 years or older were 1.7% and 28.8% in men and 2.7% and 20.7% in women The whole body bone mineral density of PSa was significantly lower than in normal subjects The handgrip strength of PSa was significantly lower than in normal subjects Stepwise regression analysis indicated that the body mass index (BMI) waist circumference and age were independently associated with SMI in men, and BMI. handgrip strength and waist circumference were independently associated with SMI in women The SMI prediction equations were applied to the validation group, and strong correlations were also observed between the DXA-measured and predicted SMI in men and women This study proposed the reference values of sarcopenia in Japanese men and women The prediction models of SMI using anthropometric measurement are valid for alternative DXA-measured SMI in Japanese adults (Jpn. J Phys Fitness Sports Med 2010, 59 : 291 similar to 302)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available