4.6 Article

Patent Foramen Ovale Closure Using a Bioabsorbable Closure Device Safety and Efficacy at 6-Month Follow-Up

Journal

JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS
Volume 3, Issue 9, Pages 968-973

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.06.012

Keywords

closure; device; patent foramen ovale; transseptal catheter

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives The aim of this study was to assess the mid-term safety and efficacy of percutaneous patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure using a bioabsorbable device (BioSTAR, NMT Medical, Boston, Massachusetts). Background Closure of PFO in patients with cryptogenic stroke has proven to be safe and effective using different types of permanent devices. Methods All consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous PFO closure with the bioabsorbable closure device between November 2007 and January 2009 were included. Residual shunt was assessed using contrast transthoracic echocardiography. Results Sixty-two patients (55% women, mean age 47.7 +/- 11.8 years) underwent PFO closure. The in-hospital complications were a surgical device retrieval in 2 patients (3.2%), device reposition in 1 (1.6%), and a minimal groin hematoma in 6 patients (9.7%). The short-term complications at 1-month follow-up (n = 60) were a transient ischemic attack in the presence of a residual shunt in 1 patient and new supraventricular tachycardia in 7 patients (11.3%). At 6-month follow-up (n = 60), 1 patient without residual shunt developed a transient ischemic attack and 1 developed atrial fibrillation. A mild or moderate residual shunt was noted in 51.7%, 33.9%, and 23.7% after 1-day, 1-month, and 6-month follow-up, respectively. A large shunt was present in 8.3%, 3.4%, and 0% after 1-day, 1-month, and 6-month follow-up. Conclusions Closure of PFO using the bioabsorbable device is associated with a low complication rate and a low recurrence rate of embolic events. However, a relatively high percentage of mild or moderate residual shunting is still present at 6-month follow-up. (J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2010;3: 968-73) (C) 2010 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available