Journal
ISRAEL JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION
Volume 60, Issue 1, Pages 41-44Publisher
BRILL
DOI: 10.1080/15659801.2014.937900
Keywords
hypothesis confidence; molecular phylogenetics; resampling measures; phylogenetic inference
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Bayesian posterior probabilities are wrongly considered by many systematists as indicative of character support, and equivalent to non-parametric bootstrap frequencies. Here I argue against this view. Non-parametric bootstrap is indicative of the amount of evidence in a data matrix supporting each clade in the tree, while Bayesian posterior probabilities are not intended to represent that property. Clades with high posterior probability may not have a large amount of characters favouring them, and their frequencies are the result of the particular sampling procedure of the Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo method, which tends to sample very similar topologies according to their posterior probabilities. Both metrics may relate to the notion of confidence, but depict different properties.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available