4.4 Article

Characterization of Precipitated Carbon by XPS and Its Prevention Mechanism of Sticking during Reduction of Fe2O3 Particles in the Fluidized Bed

Journal

ISIJ INTERNATIONAL
Volume 53, Issue 3, Pages 411-418

Publisher

IRON STEEL INST JAPAN KEIDANREN KAIKAN
DOI: 10.2355/isijinternational.53.411

Keywords

fluidized bed; Fe2O3 particles; prevention of sticking; pre-reduction; graphitic carbon; Fe3C

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50834007, 51234001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Fe2O3 particles with the diameter between 74 and 150 mu m were pre-reduced with CO at 923 K to precipitate the carbon on the surface. Then the particles were reduced by CO at 1 173 K in the fluidized bed for examining the efficiency of the precipitated carbon for preventing the sticking. The result showed that the sticking of particles with high metallization ratio could be retarded or prevented by the precipitated carbon. For clarifying the prevention mechanism of the sticking, the carbon in different states was characterized by X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) and its effects on sticking were discussed. The carbon on the surface was divided into two states, the graphitic carbon and the carbon in Fe3C. On account of the sticking of Fe3C at approximately 1 054 K and the sticking of the sponge iron at the micron scale, the structural change of the precipitated iron by the carburization and the formation of Fe3C only retard the sticking. Therefore, the prevention of the sticking at 1 173 K was attributed to the graphitic carbon. Due to the formation of metallic iron layer avoiding the consumption of the carbon and the formation of Fe3C restraining the dissolution of the graphitic carbon, the graphitic carbon accumulated on the surface of the particles, resulted in n(c)/n(Fe) above 1.0, so that Fe3C and the metallic iron was coated by the graphitic carbon to block their contact among the particles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available