4.2 Article

Alteration of apoptosis-related genes in postmenopausal women with uterine prolapse

Journal

INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL
Volume 25, Issue 7, Pages 971-977

Publisher

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-014-2347-4

Keywords

Apoptosis; Bcl-2 family gene; Pelvic organ prolapse

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We aimed to compare expression levels of antiapoptotic and proapoptotic genes in parametrial and vaginal tissues from postmenopausal women with and without pelvic organ prolapse (POP). We hypothesized that the expression of genes that induce apoptosis may be altered in vaginal and parametrial tissues in postmenopausal women with POP. Samples of vaginal and parametrial tissues were obtained from postmenopausal women with (n = 10) and without (n = 10) POP who underwent vaginal or abdominal hysterectomy. Expression levels of antiapoptotic (BCL-2, BCL-XL) and proapoptotic (BAX, BAD) genes were studied by real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Gene expression levels of BCL-2 (P < 0.001), BCL-XL (P < 0.001), BAX (p = 0.001), and BAD (p = 0.004) were all higher in vaginal tissues from the POP group compared with the non-POP group. Similarly, gene expression levels of BCL-2 (p < 0.001), BCL-XL (p < 0.001), BAX (p < 0.001), and BAD (p < 0.001) in parametrial tissues were also significantly higher in the POP group compared with the non-POP group. Additionally, expression levels of BCL-2 (p = 0.05), BCL-XL (p < 0.05), BAX (p = 0.05), and BAD (p = 0.07) in the POP group were higher in parametrial tissue than in vaginal tissue samples. Antiapoptotic and proapoptotic gene expression levels differed significantly between postmenopausal women with and without POP. Bcl-2 family genes were overexpressed in the parametrium of patients with POP compared with vaginal tissue, suggesting that the processes responsible for POP have a greater effect on parametrial tissue than vaginal tissue during the development of POP.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available