4.5 Article

Helicobacter pylori strains vary cell shape and flagellum number to maintain robust motility in viscous environments

Journal

MOLECULAR MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 99, Issue 1, Pages 88-110

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/mmi.13218

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US National Institute of Health [R01 AI094834, F31 AI098424, R25 CA153955, R00 AG042487]
  2. National Science Foundation [PHY 1058648, PHY 1410798, MCB-1244242]
  3. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R25CA153955, P30CA015704] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [F31AI098424, R01AI094839] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [R00AG042487] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  6. Division Of Physics [1410798] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience [1244242] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The helical shape of the human stomach pathogen Helicobacter pylori has been suggested to provide mechanical advantage for penetrating the viscous stomach mucus layer. Using single-cell tracking and quantitative morphology analysis, we document marked variation in cell body helical parameters and flagellum number among H. pylori strains leading to distinct and broad speed distributions in broth and viscous gastric mucin media. These distributions reflect both temporal variation in swimming speed and morphologic variation within the population. Isogenic mutants with straight-rod morphology showed 7-21% reduction in speed and a lower fraction of motile bacteria. Mutational perturbation of flagellum number revealed a 19% increase in speed with 4 versus 3 median flagellum number. Resistive force theory modeling incorporating variation of both cell shape and flagellum number predicts qualitative speed differences of 10-30% among strains. However, quantitative comparisons suggest resistive force theory underestimates the influence of cell body shape on speed for helical shaped bacteria.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available