4.4 Article

Whole Body Vibration as an Adjunct to Static Stretching

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
Volume 31, Issue 8, Pages 584-589

Publisher

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1254084

Keywords

vibration; stretching; flexibility; hamstring; whole-body-vibration

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study was a randomized control trial. The purpose of this study was twofold: 1) to determine if stretching the hamstrings during whole-body-vibration (WBV) is more effective than static stretching alone; and 2) to monitor retention of flexibility changes. The main outcome measure was hamstring flexibility as measured in degrees using a passive knee extension test. Thirty-four recreationally active college-age subjects (23.4 +/- 1.7 yrs) completed this study (22 males, 12 females, avg. ht. = 175.6 +/- 6.4 cm, avg. wt. = 74.9 +/- 11.8 kg). Subjects were assigned to a control group (C), a static stretch group (SS), or a vibration + static stretch group (V). Subjects stretched 5 days/wk for 4-weeks and were followed for 3-weeks after cessation to monitor retention. Analysis showed a significant difference between treatment groups (p < 0.0001), time (p < 0.0001), gender (p = 0.0002) and in treatment*time (p = 0.0119), with 14% +/- 3.86% (SEM) and 22% +/- 3.86% (SEM) increases in flexibility after 4-weeks of stretching for the SS and V groups respectively. Three-week follow-up showed SS returning to baseline with V group still 6.4 degrees (11% +/- 3.88% (SEM)) more flexible than at baseline. Stretching concurrently with vibration on a WBV platform appears to be a good adjunct to static stretching with the potential to enhance retention of flexibility gains.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available