4.6 Article

Analytical modeling and finite element simulation of the plastic collapse of sandwich beams with pin-reinforced foam cores

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOLIDS AND STRUCTURES
Volume 45, Issue 18-19, Pages 5127-5151

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.05.028

Keywords

sandwich; pin reinforcement; foam; modeling; collapse; optimal design

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Analytical predictions ire presented for the plastic collapse strength of lightweight sandwich beams having pin-reinforced foam cores that are loaded in 3-point bending. Both polymer and aluminum foam Cores ire considered, whilst the facesheet and the pins are made of either composite or metal. Four different failure modes are account for: metal facesheet yield or composite facesheet microbuckling, facesheet wrinkling, plastic shear of the core, and facesheet indentation beneath the loading rollers. A micromechanics-based model is developed and combined with the homogenization approach to Calculate the effective properties of pin-reinforced foam cores. To Calculate the elastic buckling strength of pin reinforcements, the pin-reinforced foam core is treated as assemblies Of simply supported Columns resting upon an elastic foundation. Minimum mass design of the sandwich is then obtained as a function of the prescribed Structural load index, subjected to the constraint that none of the above failure Modes occurs. Collapse mechanism maps are constructed and compared with the failure maps of foam-cored sandwich beams without pin reinforcements. Finite element simulations are carried Out to verify the analytical model and to Study the performance and failure mechanisms of the sandwich subject to loading types other than 3-point bending. The results demonstrate that the weaker the foam is, the more optimal the pin-reinforced foam core becomes, and that sandwich beams with pin-reinforced polymer foam cores are Structurally more efficient than foam- or truss-cored sandwich beams. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available