4.5 Article

The production and composition of rat sebum is unaffected by 3 Gy gamma radiation

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION BIOLOGY
Volume 87, Issue 4, Pages 360-371

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/09553002.2010.537432

Keywords

metabolomics; sebum; gamma-radiation; fatty acids

Funding

  1. NIH (NIAID) [U19 AI067773-05/-06]
  2. U.S. Smokeless Tobacco Company

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: The aim of this work was to use metabolomics to evaluate sebum as a source of biomarkers for gamma-radiation exposure in the rat, and potentially in man. Proof of concept of radiation metabolomics was previously demonstrated in both mouse and rat urine, from the radiation dose-and time-dependent excretion of a set of urinary biomarkers. Materials and methods: Rats were gamma-irradiated (3 Gy) or sham irradiated and groups of rats were euthanised at 1 h or 24 h post-irradiation. Sebum was collected by multiple washings of the carcasses with acetone. Nonpolar lipids were extracted, methylated, separated and quantitated using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GCMS). Metabolomic analysis of the GCMS data was performed using both orthogonal projection to latent structures-discriminant analysis and random forests machine learning algorithm. Results: Irradiation did not alter sebum production. A total of 35 lipids were identified in rat sebum, 29 fatty acids, five fatty aldehydes, and cholesterol. Metabolomics showed that three fatty acids, palmitic, 2-hydroxypalmitic, and stearic acids were potential biomarkers. Sebaceous palmitic acid was marginally statistically significantly elevated (7.5-8.4%) at 24 h post-irradiation. Conclusions: Rat sebaceous gland appears refractory to 3 Gy gamma-irradiation. Unfortunately, collection of sebum shortly after gamma-irradiation is unlikely to form the basis of high-throughput non-invasive radiation biodosimetry in man.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available