4.4 Article

Psychophysiological and self-reported responses in individuals with methamphetamine use disorder exposed to emotional video stimuli

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 133, Issue -, Pages 50-54

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.08.011

Keywords

Methamphetamine; Emotion dysregulation; Startle reflex; Emotional stimuli

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC1310405, 2016YFC0800907]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1736124]
  3. CAS Key Lab of Mental Health [Y7CX424007]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Individuals with methamphetamine use disorder (MUD) exhibit irritability and compulsive emotional responses, yet the relevant study is scarce. The characteristic of their positive and negative emotional responses can provide effective targets for the clinical intervention. In this study, we compared the emotional responses of 60 participants with MUD and 30 healthy participants to visual stimuli. They watched four types of video to elicit anger, fear, amusement, and joy emotional responses. The self-report of emotional responses (i.e., arousal, valence, and proximity), skin conductance level, and startle response were measured. Comparing to the healthy controls, the methamphetamine group's subjective arousal level of fear is significantly lower (t = 3.763, p < .01); the skin conductance level of joy is significantly higher (t = 2.086, p < .05), and the level of anger is marginal significantly higher (t = 1.984, p = .05); the startle response level of anger (t = 2.069, p < .05) and joy (t = 2.406, p < .05) is significantly higher. The methamphetamine group exhibited an enhanced emotion response to anger and a decreased response to joy which may indicate the emotion dysregulation problem caused by drug. These results provide effective targets for clinical intervention in treating patients of MUD with emotion dysregulation problems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available