4.4 Article

EPICOTYL MORPHOPHYSIOLOGICAL DORMANCY IN SEEDS OF DAPHNIPHYLLUM GLAUCESCENS, A WOODY MEMBER OF THE SAXIFRAGALES

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCES
Volume 170, Issue 2, Pages 174-181

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/595283

Keywords

epicotyl dormancy; morphophysiological dormancy; seed dormancy; seed germination; underdeveloped embryo

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Available information on seed dormancy for various members of the Saxifragales and phylogenetic relationships within this order allowed us to accurately predict that Daphniphyllum glaucescens seeds have morphophysiological dormancy (MPD). However, our hypothesis that seeds had deep simple epicotyl MPD, i.e., nondeep physiological dormancy (PD) in root and deep PD in shoot, was not supported. Both the root and the shoot (cotyledons) of the underdeveloped embryo of D. glaucescens have nondeep PD. Exposure to moderate (15 degrees/6 degrees, 20 degrees/10 degrees C), rather than high (25 degrees/15 degrees C), temperatures for 10-12 wk broke the PD of the hypocotyl/ root. After hypocotyl emergence, seeds with an attached developing root system did not require cold stratification to break the PD of the shoot. The PD of the shoot was broken by an additional 10-12 wk at moderate temperatures, during which time cotyledons slowly grew inside the seed. As cotyledons grew, all of the hypocotyl was pushed out of the seed, and the final cotyledon length was almost twice that of the seed; at this point, the folded cotyledons emerged. Since the level of PD in root and shoot may or may not be the same, we advocate stating the level of PD in both root and shoot when epicotyl MPD is described in a species. Thus, seeds of D. glaucescens have nondeep simple (root)-nondeep simple (epicotyl) MPD, which is written as C1bB(root)-C1bB(shoot) in the formula system of Nikolaeva. This is the first report of this level of epicotyl MPD in the Saxifragales.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available