4.5 Article

The current standard measure of cardiorespiratory fitness introduces confounding by body mass: the DR's EXTRA study

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY
Volume 36, Issue 8, Pages 1135-1140

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ijo.2011.212

Keywords

abnormal glucose metabolism; body mass; cardiorespiratory fitness; maximal oxygen uptake

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education of Finland [116/722/2004, 134/627/2005, 44/627/2006, 113/627/2007, 41/627/2008]
  2. Academy of Finland [104943, 211119, 123885]
  3. European Commission [LSHM-CT-2004-005272]
  4. City of Kuopio
  5. Finnish Diabetes Association
  6. Kuopio University Hospital
  7. Paivikki and Sakari Sohlberg Foundation
  8. Social Insurance Institution of Finland
  9. Finnish Medical Foundation
  10. Swedish Council for Working Life
  11. Finnish Heart Association
  12. Bruno Krachler
  13. Academy of Finland (AKA) [211119] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: Cardiorespiratory fitness is currently estimated by dividing maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) by body weight (per-weight standard). However, the statistically correct way to neutralize the effect of weight on VO2max in a given population is adjustment for body weight by regression techniques (adjusted standard). Our objective is to quantify the bias introduced by the per-weight standard in a population distributed across different categories of body mass. DESIGN: This is a cross-sectional study. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Baseline measures from participants of the Dose-Responses to Exercise Training Study (DR's EXTRA), 635 men (body mass index (BMI): 19-47 kgm(-2)) and 638 women (BMI: 16-49 kgm(-2)) aged 57-78 years who performed oral glucose tolerance tests and maximal exercise stress tests with direct measurement of VO2max. We compare the increase in VO2max implied by the per-weight standard with the real increase of VO2max per kg body weight. A linear logistic regression model estimates odds for abnormal glucose metabolism (either impaired fasting glycemia or impaired glucose tolerance or Type 2 diabetes) of the least-fit versus most-fit quartile according to both per-weight standard and adjusted standard. RESULTS: The per-weight standard implies an increase of VO2max with 20.9 ml min(-1) in women and 26.4 ml min(-1) in men per additional kg body weight. The true increase per kg is only 7.0 ml min(-1) (95% confidence interval: 5.3-8.8) and 8.0 ml min(-1) (95% confidence interval: 5.3-10.7), respectively. Risk for abnormal glucose metabolism in the least-fit quartile of the population is overestimated by 52% if the per-weight standard is used. CONCLUSIONS: In comparisons across different categories of body mass, the per-weight standard systematically underestimates cardiorespiratory fitness in obese subjects. Use of the per-weight standard markedly inflates associations between poor fitness and co-morbidities of obesity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available