4.2 Article

Relationship Between Activated Astrocytes and Hypoxic Cerebral Tissue in a Rat Model of Cerebral Ischemia/Reperfusion

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 121, Issue 1, Pages 1-7

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/00207454.2010.535933

Keywords

Astrocyte; cerebral infarction; glial fibrillary acidic protein; hypoxia; immunofluorescence; ischemia

Categories

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Project of Guangdong province, China [2007B031502007]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Following cerebral infarction, hypoxic tissues remains in the ischemic cortex for long periods of time. Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) is a specific marker of astrocytes, which is thought to be essential for neuronal survival. We aimed to clarify the relationship between hypoxic tissue and astrocytes following cerebral infarction. Rats with middle cerebral artery occlusion were randomly divided into a 1.5-hour ischemia-reperfusion(1.5-hour IR) group and a permanent ischemia (PI) group. Hypoxic tissue and GFAP fluorescence intensity in the ischemic cortex were observed postoperatively on days 1, 3, 7, and 14. Results showed that hypoxic tissue was present from day 1 to 14 in the 1.5-hour IR group and on days 1 and 3 in the PI group. The GFAP fluorescence intensity in the 1.5-hour IR group was stronger than that in the PI group at the same time point of observation. Over time, GFAP expression increased and peaked at 7 days in each group, followed by a decrease in signal. In hypoxic tissue, the GFAP fluorescence intensity was stronger than that in the surrounding tissue at all observation time points. These data indicate that astrocytes were strongly activated in hypoxic tissue induced by temporary ischemia followed by reperfusion. The activation of astrocytes may partially contribute to the survival and repair of hypoxic tissue following brain ischemia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available