4.7 Article

ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSES FROM VAGUS NERVE STIMULATION IN RATS

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEURAL SYSTEMS
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

WORLD SCIENTIFIC PUBL CO PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1142/S0129065713500275

Keywords

Vagus nerve recording; nerve fiber type; laryngeal muscle potential; vagus nerve stimulation

Funding

  1. Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (FWO)
  2. Ghent Institute for Neuroscience
  3. Bijzonder Onderzoeksfond (BOF) from Ghent University
  4. FWO
  5. BOF
  6. Ghent University Hospital

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The mechanism of action of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) for pharmacoresistant epilepsy is unknown and the therapeutic outcome is highly variable. We investigated stimulation-induced vagus nerve electrophysiological responses in rats using various stimulation parameters. Conduction velocity, I-50, rheobase and chronaxie were calculated. We identified an early and late component corresponding to an afferent compound action potential (CAP) and a remote laryngeal motor-evoked potential (LMEP), respectively. The conduction velocity (CAP: 26.2 +/- 1.4m/s; LMEP: 32.4 +/- 2.4m/s) and I50 (CAP: 2.4 +/- 0.3mA; LMEP: 1.8 +/- 0.2mA) were significantly different for both components, the rheobase (CAP: 140 +/- 30 mu A; LMEP: 110 +/- 26 mu A) and chronaxie (CAP: 66 +/- 7 mu s; LMEP: 73 +/- 9 mu s) were not. Using a pulse of 10 mu s, the CAP saturated between 4-5 mA. Our method can be used to record VNS-induced electrophysiological responses in rats and provides an objective biomarker for electrical stimulation with various parameters in an experimental set-up. Our findings are potentially useful for clinical purposes in the sense that combination of VNS and recording of vagal nerve CAPs may help clinicians to determine the individual optimal intensity required to fully activate fast-conducting afferent fibers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available