4.6 Article

AMBIENT AWARENESS AND KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION: USING SOCIAL MEDIA TO LEARN WHO KNOWS WHAT AND WHO KNOWS WHOM

Journal

MIS QUARTERLY
Volume 39, Issue 4, Pages 747-762

Publisher

SOC INFORM MANAGE-MIS RES CENT
DOI: 10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.4.1

Keywords

Social networking sites; knowledge sharing; organizational learning; accuracy; technology use; communication; collaboration; transparency

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [SES-1331492, ACI-1322103]
  2. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [1543690] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  3. Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure (OAC) [1543690] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The argument proffered in this paper is that use of enterprise social networking technologies can increase the accuracy of people's metaknowledge (knowledge of who knows what and who knows whom) at work. The results of a quasi-natural field experiment in which only one of two matched-sample groups within a large financial services firm was given access to the enterprise social networking technology for six months revealed that by making people's communications with specific partners visible to others in the organization, the technology enabled observers to become aware of the communications occurring amongst their coworkers and to make inferences about what and whom those coworkers knew based on the contents of the messages they sent and to whom they were sent. Consequently only individuals in the group that used the social networking technology for six months improved the accuracy of their metaknowledge (a 31% improvement in knowledge of who knows what and an 88% improvement in knowledge of who knows whom). There were no improvements in the other group over the same time period. Based on these findings, how technologically enabled ambient awareness-awareness of ambient communications occurring amongst others in the organization-can be an important antecedent for knowledge acquisition is discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available