4.0 Article

RESONANT ENHANCEMENT OF NUCLEAR REACTIONS AS A POSSIBLE SOLUTION TO THE COSMOLOGICAL LITHIUM PROBLEM

Journal

Publisher

WORLD SCIENTIFIC PUBL CO PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1142/S0218301312500048

Keywords

Big bang nucleosynthesis; lithium problem; resonant nuclear reactions

Funding

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation [PHY-01-10253, PHY-02-016783, PHY-08-22648]
  2. NSERC, Canada
  3. Government of Canada through NSERC
  4. Province of Ontario through MEUT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is a significant discrepancy between the current theoretical prediction of the cosmological lithium abundance, mostly produced as Be during the Big Bang, and its observationally inferred value. We investigate whether the resonant enhancement of He-7 burning reactions may alleviate this discrepancy. We identify one narrow nuclear level in B-9, E5/2+ similar or equal to 16.7 MeV that is not sufficiently studied experimentally, and being just similar to 200 keNT above the 7Be d threshold, may lead to the resonant enhancement of Be-7(d, gamma)B-9 and Be-7(d,p)(alpha alpha) reactions. We determine the relationship between the domain of resonant energies E-r, and the deuterium separation width Gamma(d) that results in the significant depletion of the cosmological lithium abundance and find that (E-r, Gamma(d)) similar or equal to (170 - 220, 10 - 40) keV can eliminate the current discrepancy. Such a large width at this resonant energy can be only achieved if the interaction radius for the deuterium entrance channel is very large, a(27) >= 10 fm. New nuclear experimental and theoretical work is needed to clarify the role this resonance plays on the BBN prediction of the lithium abundance. Alternatively, the most liberal interpretation of the allowed parameters of 16.7 MeV resonance can significantly increase the errors in predicted lithium abundance: [Li-7/H](BBN) = (2.5 6) x 10(-10).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available