How Effective Are Incident-Reporting Systems for Improving Patient Safety? A Systematic Literature Review
Published 2015 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
How Effective Are Incident-Reporting Systems for Improving Patient Safety? A Systematic Literature Review
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
MILBANK QUARTERLY
Volume 93, Issue 4, Pages 826-866
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2015-12-02
DOI
10.1111/1468-0009.12166
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Hip fracture in hospitalized medical patients
- (2013) Antonio Zapatero et al. BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS
- Can incident reporting improve safety? Healthcare practitioners' views of the effectiveness of incident reporting
- (2013) J. E. Anderson et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE
- A Comprehensive Quality Assurance Program for Personnel and Procedures in Radiation Oncology: Value of Voluntary Error Reporting and Checklists
- (2013) John A. Kalapurakal et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS
- Quality-related event learning in community pharmacies: Manual versus computerized reporting processes
- (2013) Todd A. Boyle et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATION
- High-Reliability Health Care: Getting There from Here
- (2013) MARK R. CHASSIN et al. MILBANK QUARTERLY
- Elective surgical patients' narratives of hospitalization: The co-construction of safety
- (2013) Carole Doherty et al. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE
- Patient safety in vitreoretinal surgery: quality improvements following a patient safety reporting system
- (2012) S Chien Wong et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
- Prevention of a wrong-location misadministration through the use of an intradepartmental incident learning system
- (2012) Eric C. Ford et al. MEDICAL PHYSICS
- Patients' willingness and ability to participate actively in the reduction of clinical errors: A systematic literature review
- (2012) Carole Doherty et al. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE
- Identifying and Reducing Medication Errors in Psychiatry
- (2011) Geetha Jayaram et al. Journal of Psychiatric Practice
- Counterheroism, Common Knowledge, and Ergonomics: Concepts from Aviation That Could Improve Patient Safety
- (2011) GERAINT H. LEWIS et al. MILBANK QUARTERLY
- Explaining Michigan: Developing an Ex Post Theory of a Quality Improvement Program
- (2011) MARY DIXON-WOODS et al. MILBANK QUARTERLY
- Policy and practice in the use of root cause analysis to investigate clinical adverse events: Mind the gap
- (2011) Davide Nicolini et al. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE
- Critical incident reporting and learning
- (2010) R.P. Mahajan BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA
- Design-based regulation and patient safety: A regulatory studies perspective
- (2010) Karen Yeung et al. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE
- Lean healthcare: Rhetoric, ritual and resistance
- (2010) Justin J. Waring et al. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE
- Trends in healthcare incident reporting and relationship to safety and quality data in acute hospitals: results from the National Reporting and Learning System
- (2009) A Hutchinson et al. QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE
- Constructing and re-constructing narratives of patient safety
- (2009) Justin J. Waring SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE
- Attitudes toward the large-scale implementation of an incident reporting system
- (2008) J. Braithwaite et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE
- Use of a falls incident reporting system to improve care process documentation in nursing homes
- (2008) L M Wagner et al. QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE
- Improving transfusion safety: implementation of a comprehensive computerized bar codebased tracking system for detecting and preventing errors
- (2008) R.W. Askeland et al. TRANSFUSION
Create your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started