ELECTROWEAK SYMMETRY BREAKING AND THE HIGGS BOSON: CONFRONTING THEORIES AT COLLIDERS
Published 2013 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
ELECTROWEAK SYMMETRY BREAKING AND THE HIGGS BOSON: CONFRONTING THEORIES AT COLLIDERS
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODERN PHYSICS A
Volume 28, Issue 02, Pages 1330004
Publisher
World Scientific Pub Co Pte Lt
Online
2013-01-23
DOI
10.1142/s0217751x13300044
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Higgs couplings after the discovery
- (2012) Tilman Plehn et al. EPL
- Probing minimal supersymmetry at the LHC with the Higgs boson masses
- (2012) L Maiani et al. NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS
- Have we observed the Higgs boson (imposter)?
- (2012) Ian Low et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- Light custodians and Higgs physics in composite models
- (2012) Aleksandr Azatov et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- Light stops from Seiberg duality
- (2012) Csaba Csáki et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- Superconformal technicolor: Models and phenomenology
- (2012) Aleksandr Azatov et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- Higgs underproduction at the LHC
- (2012) Bogdan A. Dobrescu et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- Looking for a light Higgs boson in theZγ→ll¯γchannel
- (2012) James S. Gainer et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- Higgs fits preference for suppressed down-type couplings: Implications for supersymmetry
- (2012) Aleksandr Azatov et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- Superconformal Technicolor
- (2012) Aleksandr Azatov et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
- Measuring Higgs Couplings from LHC Data
- (2012) Markus Klute et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
- Search for the Standard Model Higgs Boson in the Diphoton Decay Channel with4.9 fb−1ofppCollision Data ats=7 TeVwith ATLAS
- (2012) G. Aad et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
- Search for the Standard Model Higgs boson in the decay channel H→ZZ(⁎)→4ℓ with 4.8 fb−1 of pp collision data at s=7 TeV with ATLAS
- (2012) G. Aad et al. PHYSICS LETTERS B
- Heavier Higgs particles: Indications from Minimal Supersymmetry
- (2012) L. Maiani et al. PHYSICS LETTERS B
- Partially (in)visible Higgs decays at the LHC
- (2012) Christoph Englert et al. PHYSICS LETTERS B
- Search for the standard model Higgs boson decaying to bottom quarks in pp collisions at s=7 TeV
- (2012) S. Chatrchyan et al. PHYSICS LETTERS B
- Search for the Standard Model Higgs boson in the H→WW(⋆)→ℓνℓν decay mode with 4.7 fb−1 of ATLAS data at s=7 TeV
- (2012) G. Aad et al. PHYSICS LETTERS B
- Reproducing the Higgs boson data with vector-like quarks
- (2012) N. Bonne et al. PHYSICS LETTERS B
- The constrained NMSSM and Higgs near 125 GeV
- (2012) John F. Gunion et al. PHYSICS LETTERS B
- Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC
- (2012) S. Chatrchyan et al. PHYSICS LETTERS B
- Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC
- (2012) G. Aad et al. PHYSICS LETTERS B
- Production of a composite Higgs boson
- (2011) Ian Low et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- Seiberg dual for the MSSM: Partially compositeWandZ
- (2011) Csaba Csáki et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- THE NEXT-TO-MINIMAL SUPERSYMMETRIC EXTENSION OF THE STANDARD MODEL REVIEWED
- (2010) M. MANIATIS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODERN PHYSICS A
- The Next-to-Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model
- (2010) Ulrich Ellwanger et al. PHYSICS REPORTS-REVIEW SECTION OF PHYSICS LETTERS
- Standard model couplings and collider signatures of a light scalar
- (2009) JiJi Fan et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- Effective Lagrangian for low-scale technicolor
- (2009) Kenneth Lane et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- Distinguishing the Higgs Boson from the Dilaton at the Large Hadron Collider
- (2008) Walter D. Goldberger et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started