4.4 Article

Differential adherence of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli harboring saa to epithetial cells

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 298, Issue 7-8, Pages 571-578

Publisher

ELSEVIER GMBH, URBAN & FISCHER VERLAG
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2007.12.003

Keywords

Escherichia coli; Shiga toxin; Adhesin; STEC autoagglutinating adhesion

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan
  2. Takeda Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The majority of Shiga toxigenic Escherichia coli (STEC) strains isolated from severe STEC disease are those harboring the locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE), which encodes factors involved in adherence to epithelial cells. However, LEE-negative STEC are increasingly isolated from clinical cases. STEC autoagglutinating adhesin (Saa) is widely used as it marker of adhesin in the absence of LEE. In the present Study. we compared the adherence of 32 saa-harboring, STEC strains to cultured epithelial cells in the absence or presence of D-mannose. In the absence of D-mannose, 19 strains were adherent to HEp-2 and Caco-2 cells, while 12 were non-adherent. One strain showed detachment of epithelial cells. The adherence of 13 strains was sensitive to the presence of D-mannose. The saa mutant of strain T141. in which adherence was mannose resistant, did not show a significant decrease in adherence compared to the wild type, suggesting a Saa-independent mechanism of adherence. saa-harboring STEC exhibited differential binding properties to epithelial cells, which could not be attributed to the nUrnber or C-terminal repeats of Saa. or to the expression or Saa as detected by Western blotting. Our results suggest that multiple adherence mechanisms arc present in saa-harboring STEC, implying a high degree of diversity in this group of STEC. (C) 2007 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available