4.3 Article

Counter-ion and solvent effects in electrospray ionization of solutions of alkali metal and quaternary ammonium salts

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MASS SPECTROMETRY
Volume 354, Issue -, Pages 219-228

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijms.2013.06.023

Keywords

Aggregation; Counter-ion; Electrospray ionization; Ion pairing; Solvent effects

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [KO 2875/4-1]
  2. Georg-August-Universitat Gottingen

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite the wide use of electrospray ionization (ESI) mass spectrometry, the factors determining the relative signal intensities of different analytes are not yet fully understood. We have performed a systematic study to assess the influence of selected counter-ions (Br-, ClO4-, BF4-, BPh4-) on the ESI response of alkali-metal (Li+, Cs+) and quaternary ammonium ions (NEt4+, NBu4+) over a concentration range of 0.025-2.5 mmol L-1. Specifically, we have subjected solutions containing equimolar mixtures of these analytes in H2O, CH3OH, CH3CN, and tetrahydrofuran, respectively, to ESI and determined the relative signal intensities of the ions thus produced. Especially in the aprotic solvents, variation of the counterion can significantly change the outcome of the ESI process, which we ascribe to ion pairing. The smaller counter-ions Br-, ClO4-, and BF4- undergo more selective ion pairing in that their tendencies to pair up with the cations strongly decrease in the order Li+ > Cs+ > NEt4+ > NBu4+. In contrast, ion pairing of the larger BPh4- counter-ion with the different cations is much less selective. As a result, the smaller counterions Br-, ClO4-, and BF4- suppress the ESI response of Li+ and Cs+ ions significantly more strongly than does BPh4-. Additional evidence for selective ion pairing comes from the observation of ionic aggregates enriched in the alkali-metal ions relative to the quaternary ammonium ions. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available