4.4 Article

Neck loads and posture exposure of helicopter pilots during simulated day and night flights

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ERGONOMICS
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages 128-135

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2011.01.001

Keywords

Cervical spine loading; Cumulative loading; Military pilots; Neck posture

Funding

  1. Department of National Defense Canada (JPN/WJA) [W3931-050513-001-SV]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated neck loads and neck postures experienced by Canadian Forces (CF) helicopter pilots during routine simulator day and night flights. During the night flights pilots' helmets were equipped with night vision goggles (NVG) which have been implicated in the increase of neck pain amongst pilots. Pilot's postures were determined from video recordings of their flight missions to: (1) identify the neck postures assumed during day and night flight missions. and (2) determine the amount of biomechanical cervical spine loading experienced during these flights. Neck postures and peak and cumulative cervical kinetic loading were significant different (P < 0.05) between day and night. During night flights the percentage of work cycle spent in mildly flexed posture increased significantly from 43% during day flights to 74% during night flights. As well, cumulative reaction compression values significantly increased from 583 kN s to 694 kN s. The biomechanical results lend support to previous physiological investigations of NVG use and further justify the need for guidelines associated with NVG use. Relevance to industry: The research highlights the biomechanical demands on the neck resulting from wearing a helmet with added weight from night vision equipment. The results have direct implication to military and commercial operators required to wear night vision equipment or added weight to the head. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available