4.4 Article

IS OSTEOPONTIN INVOLVED IN CUTANEOUS FIBROBLAST ACTIVATION? ITS HYPOTHETICAL ROLE IN SCLERODERMA PATHOGENESIS

Journal

Publisher

BIOLIFE SAS
DOI: 10.1177/039463201402700112

Keywords

systemic sclerosis; osteopontin; dermal fibrosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Osteopontin (OPN) is an extracellular matrix protein implicated in bone remodeling, but it presents also pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic properties. OPN expression also occurs upon exposure of cells to classical mediators of acute inflammation such as tumor necrosis growth factor alpha (TNF-alpha) and interleukin-1 beta (IL-1 beta), as well as fibrogenic cytokines such as transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta), although a detailed understanding of these regulatory pathways is still unknown. Plasma OPN levels in both limited and diffuse systemic sclerosis patients (lSSc and dSSc) were statistically higher compared to those of control subjects. Immunohistology demonstrated that high TGF-beta levels, alpha smooth muscle actin (alpha SMA) levels and consequently high OPN levels were found in the affected skin of sclerodermic patients (lSSc and dSSc) compared to levels found in healthy skin. In order to better understand how OPN interferes with the fibrotic process, healthy skin fibroblasts were treated for 24 and 48 hours with bleomycin and with endothelin-1 (ET-1) plus TGF-beta in order to induce the fibrogenesis. After 48 hours of stimulation, healthy treated fibroblasts showed statistically increased alpha SMA levels (index of differentiation into myofibroblasts) and simultaneously statistically increased OPN levels compared to healthy untreated ones. This study demonstrates that OPN levels increase simultaneously with the increasing of alpha SMA levels, therefore it is reasonable to hypothesize that OPN interferes in the pathogenesis of Systemic Sclerosis in the early stage of fibroblast differentiation process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available