4.4 Article

Thermal ablation of the goat mammary gland as a model for post-lumpectomy treatment of breast cancer: Preliminary observations

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYPERTHERMIA
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages 47-55

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02656730802322946

Keywords

Thermal ablation; mammary gland; radiation therapy; breast cancer

Funding

  1. Chicago Bears and McCormick Breast and Ovarian Cancer Research Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Partial breast irradiation post-lumpectomy, with a balloon bearing a radioactive source in its center, is practiced as an alternative to whole breast irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. The goal is to ablate residual malignant cells within 1 cm radius of the resected lumpectomy margin. We hypothesize that this goal may be achieved with a fluid-filled heated balloon. Methods. Nubian-cross goats were treated under general anesthesia. The two mammary glands were sequentially bisected and a non-inflated balloon with a heating element was placed in the center of the gland which was re-sutured. Two series of experiments were conducted. In the first 22 goats (44 glands), the balloon was inflated with 5% dextrose to a pressure of 150 mmHg and heated at 87C over selected time intervals of 1-24 minutes. In the second series (16 glands), the re-programmed device operated at 50-80 mmHg over selected time intervals of 5-20 minutes. The depth of necrosis was histologically determined after sacrificing the goats and excising the glands. Results. In the first series, glandular necrosis was noted to extend to a depth of 3.2-9.6 mm for the above heating cycles. Corresponding figures for the second series ranged from 4.7-8.6 mm for treatment times of one minute 'warm up' to 20 minutes of heating at 90C. The animals exhibited no systemic side effects post-treatment. Conclusion. An experimental model describing a thermal technique causing necrosis of the goat mammary gland is described.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available