4.7 Article

Enhancing Ni anode performance via Gd2O3 addition in molten carbonate-type direct carbon fuel cell

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 39, Issue 29, Pages 16541-16547

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.03.180

Keywords

Direct carbon fuel cell; Anode; Gadolinium oxide(Gd2O3); Peak power density; Wettability

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) [2012-0008830, 2013M1A8A1040703, 2010-0019543]
  2. GCRC-SOP - Korea government (MEST)
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2013M1A8A1040703] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recently, there is a consensus that a limited performance in direct carbon fuel cell (DCFC) using molten carbonate electrolyte is caused by the limited triple phase boundaries (TPB) formation. In order to solve this problem, we added Gd2O3, a well-known lanthanide oxide material for the improvement of wettability in the Ni anode. As a result, it was clearly shown that the voltage drop level and charge transfer resistance was decreased, and therefore the peak power density was increased by almost two times that of solely Ni anode to reach up to 106.7 mW/cm(2) with carbon black and 114.1 mW/cm(2) with actual coal fuel. The increased wettability led to the improvement of triple phase boundary (TPB) formation and consequently the enhancement of DCFC performance. While the wettability was increased with oxide content in Ni anode, the proportion of Ni at the surface of anode and the electronic conductivity was gradually decreased. With this reason, the peak power density showed the volcano type change with the amount of Gd2O3 addition. Finally, it was revealed that the optimum composition for the anode was Ni:Gd2O3 = 1:5 in weight ratio. Copyright (C) 2014, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available