4.7 Article

Biohydrogen production from wheat straw hydrolysate using Caldicellulosiruptor saccharolyticus followed by biogas production in a two-step uncoupled process

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 38, Issue 22, Pages 9121-9130

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.05.075

Keywords

Caldicellulosiruptor saccharolyticus; Hydrogen; CSTR; Methane; UASB; Lignocellulosic biomass

Funding

  1. Swedish Energy Agency [31090-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A two-step, un-coupled process producing hydrogen (H-2) from wheat straw using Caldicellulosiruptor saccharolyticus in a 'Continuously stirred tank reactor' (CSTR) followed by anaerobic digestion of its effluent to produce methane (CH4) was investigated. C. saccharolyticus was able to convert wheat straw hydrolysate to hydrogen at maximum production rate of approximately 5.2 L H-2/L/Day. The organic compounds in the effluent collected from the CSTR were successfully converted to CH4 through anaerobic digestion performed in an 'Up-flow anaerobic sludge bioreactor' (UASB) reactor at a maximum production rate of 2.6 L CH4/L/clay. The maximum energy output of the process (10.9 kJ/g of straw) was about 57% of the total energy, and 67% of the energy contributed by the sugar fraction, contained in the wheat straw. Sparging the hydrogenogenic CSTR with the flue gas of the UASB reactor ((60% v/v) CH4 and (40% v/v) CO2) decreased the H-2 production rate by 44%, which was due to the significant presence of CO2. The presence of CH4 alone, like N-2, was indifferent to growth and H-2 production by C. saccharolyticus. Hence, sparging with upgraded CH4 would guarantee successful hydrogen production from lignocellulosic biomass prior to anaerobic digestion and thus, reasonably high conversion efficiency can be achieved. Copyright (C) 2013, The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available