4.7 Article

Mechanism for the decomposition of lithium borohydride

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 37, Issue 7, Pages 5825-5832

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.01.002

Keywords

Hydrogen storage; Lithium borohydride; Defects; Kinetics; First-principles

Funding

  1. General Motors Corporation
  2. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-07ER46434]
  3. DOE Office of Science [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  4. CNSI Computing Facility under NSF [CHE-0321368]
  5. Naval Research Laboratory [NRL-N00173-08-G001]
  6. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-FG02-07ER46434] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report first-principles density functional theory studies of native defects in lithium borohydride (LiBH4), a potential material for hydrogen storage. Based on our detailed analysis of the structure, energetics, and migration of lithium-, boron-, and hydrogen-related defects, we propose a specific mechanism for the decomposition and dehydrogenation of LiBH4 that involves mass transport mediated by native defects. In this mechanism, LiBH4 releases borane (BH3) at the surface or interface, leaving the negatively charged hydrogen interstitial (H-i(-)) in the material, which then acts as the nucleation site for LiH formation. The diffusion of (H-i(-)) in the bulk LiBH4 is the rate-limiting step in the decomposition kinetics. Lithium vacancies and interstitials have low formation energies and are highly mobile. These defects are responsible for maintaining local charge neutrality as other charged defects migrating along the material, and assisting in the formation of LiH. In light of this mechanism, we discuss the effects of metal additives on hydrogen desorption kinetics. Copyright (C) 2012, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available