4.7 Article

A model for the laminar flame speed of binary fuel blends and its application to methane/hydrogen mixtures

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 37, Issue 13, Pages 10390-10396

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.04.015

Keywords

Laminar flame speed; Binary fuel blends; Methane/hydrogen

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51136005, 50976003]
  2. Doctoral Fund of Ministry of Education of China [20100001120003]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Engines [K2012-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent studies have demonstrated promising performance of adding hydrogen to methane in internal combustion engines and substantial attention has been devoted to binary fuel blends. Due to the strong nonlinearity of chemical reaction process, the laminar flame speed of binary fuel blends cannot be obtained from linear combination of the laminar flame speed of each individual fuel constituent. In this study, theoretical analysis is conducted for a planar premixed flame of binary fuel blends and a model for the laminar flame speed is developed. The model shows that the laminar flame speed of binary fuel blends depends on the square of the laminar flame speed of each individual fuel component. This model can predict the laminar flame speed of binary fuel blends when three laminar flame speeds are available: two for each individual fuel component and the third one for the fuel blends at one selected blending ratio. The performance of this model as well as models reported in the literature is assessed for methane/hydrogen mixtures. It is demonstrated that good agreements with calculations or measurements can be achieved by the present model prediction. Moreover, it is found that the present model also works for other binary fuel blends besides methane/hydrogen. Copyright (c) 2012, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available