4.7 Article

Discrete approach for flow field designs of parallel channel configurations in fuel cells

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 37, Issue 14, Pages 10881-10897

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.04.034

Keywords

Bipolar plate; Fuel cell stack; Flow distribution; Manifold; Pressure drop; Network

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is the major challenge to transform a laboratory scale production of fuel cells to an industrial scale one and to meet the requirements of throughput, operating life, low cost, reliability and high efficiency in R&D of fuel cells. Designs of uniform flow distribution are central to upscale fuel cells as well as to tackle critical issues of water, thermal and current management. However, in spite of our growing appreciation of designs of uniform flow distribution, there is little or no practical solution to ensure a uniform flow distribution across channels of a cell and cells of a stack in designs of flow fields. The purpose of this paper was to develop a discrete approach to find a design that met requirements of flow distribution uniformity and pressure drop in parallel channel configurations with Z-type arrangement through adjustments of configurations and normalised structural parameters. Variation of the frictional and the momentum coefficients with flow velocities was incorporated into the flow distribution equation to improve modelling accuracy. We also developed procedure, measures and guideline for the designs of flow distribution and pressure drop to bridge knowledge gap between the generalised theory and industrial applications. The results showed that the present approach could provide the practical guideline to evaluate quantitatively performance of different layout configurations, structures, and flow conditions. Copyright (C) 2012, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available