4.7 Article

Significance of carbon to nitrogen ratio on the long-term stability of continuous photofermentative hydrogen production

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 36, Issue 24, Pages 15583-15594

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.09.043

Keywords

Biohydrogen; Rhodobacter capsulatus; C/N; Photofermentation; Panel photobioreactor

Funding

  1. METU [2006-07-020001, 07-02-2009-0001]
  2. EU [019825]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The stable and optimized operation of photobioreactors (PBRs) is the most challenging task in photofermentative biological hydrogen production. The carbon to nitrogen ratio (C/N) in the feed is a critical parameter that significantly influences microbial growth and hydrogen production. In this study, the effects of changing the C/N ratio to achieve stable biomass and continuous hydrogen production using fed-batch cultures of Rhodobacter capsulatus YO3 (uptake hydrogenase deleted, hup-) were investigated. The experiments were carried out in 8 L panel PBRs operated in indoor conditions under continuous illumination and controlled temperature. Culture media containing different acetate (40-80 mM) and glutamate (2-4 mM) concentrations were used to study the effects of changing the C/N ratio on biomass growth and hydrogen production. Stable biomass concentration of 0.40 g dry cell weight per liter culture (gDCW/L-c) and maximum hydrogen productivity of 0.66 mmol hydrogen per liter culture per hour (mmol/L-c/h) were achieved during fed-batch operation with media containing 40 mM acetate and 4 mM glutamate, C/N = 25, for a period of over 20 days. A study on the effect of biomass recycling on biomass growth and hydrogen production showed that the feedback of cells into the photobioreactor improved biomass stability during the fed-batch operation but decreased hydrogen productivity. Copyright (C) 2011, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available