4.7 Article

Diffusion flame of a CH4/H2 jet in hot low-oxygen coflow

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 36, Issue 15, Pages 9267-9277

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.04.180

Keywords

MILD combustion; Hydrogen; Jet in hot coflow; Diffusion flame

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11072005, 50936001]
  2. Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Coal Combustion of China
  3. Changsha University of Science Technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper reports an investigation by RANS modeling on diffusion flames of a methane-hydrogen (CH4/H-2) jet issuing into a hot and low-oxygen ([O-2] = 3%, 6% and 9%) coflow from a burner system similar to that of Dally et al. [Proc. Combust. Inst. 29 (2002) 1147-1154]. The experimental conditions of Dally et al. are used for validation of the modeling. The Eddy Dissipation Concept (EDC) model is used with three detailed reaction mechanisms, i.e. DRM-22, GRI-Mech 2.11 and GRI-Mech 3.0. The influence of the coflow temperature (T*(cof)), ranging from 1250 K to 1700 K, is investigated. Besides, the effect of the hydrogen fraction (f*(H2), by mass) in the mixture of CH4/H-2 is examined at f*(H2) = 11%, 15%, 20% and 30%. It is found that, as T*(cof) is increased, the mean temperature is distributed more uniformly whereas the concentrations of radical species (e.g., OH, HCO, H2CO) become less homogeneous. Interestingly, also, the overall effect of f*(H2) is mixed by two individual effects from the jet entrainment ratio (decelerating chemical reaction) and jet strain rate (accelerating chemical reaction). As a result, a variation of f*(H2) does not change the JHC flame structure significantly. Hence, T*(cof) has a significant influence on the JHC flame while the impact of varying f*(H2) is much weaker. Crown Copyright (C) 2011, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available