4.7 Article

Optimization of fermentative hydrogen production process using genetic algorithm based on neural network and response surface methodology

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 34, Issue 1, Pages 255-261

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.10.010

Keywords

Biohydrogen production; bioenergy; response surface methodology; neural network; genetic algorithm

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50325824]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A central composite design was carried out to investigate the effect of temperature, initial pH and glucose concentration on fermentative hydrogen production by mixed cultures in batch test. The modeling abilities of the response surface methodology model and neural network model, as well as the optimizing abilities of response surface methodology and the genetic algorithm based on a neural network model were compared. The results showed that the root mean square error and the standard error of prediction for the neural network model were much smaller than those for the response surface methodology model, indicting that the neural network model had a much higher modeling ability than the response surface methodology model. The maximum hydrogen yield of 289.8 mL/g glucose identified by response surface methodology was a little lower than that of 360.5 mL/g glucose identified by the genetic algorithm based on a neural network model, indicating that the genetic algorithm based on a neural network model had a much higher optimizing ability than the response surface methodology. Thus, the genetic algorithm based on a neural network model is a better optimization method than response surface methodology and is recommended to be used during the optimization of fermentative hydrogen production process. (C) 2008 International Association for Hydrogen Energy. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available