4.5 Article

Wall-oscillation conditions for drag reduction in turbulent channel flow

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND FLUID FLOW
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages 891-902

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2007.12.005

Keywords

turbulent channel flow; turbulent drag reduction; spanwise wall oscillation; direct numerical simulation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The drag reduction properties of a turbulent channel flow modified by spanwise sinusoidal oscillations of the walls are investigated by direct numerical simulations. The work is based on the linear relation between the drag reduction and the parameter S, function of the maximum wall velocity and the period of the oscillation. This quantity, first determined by Choi et al. [Choi, J.-I, Xu, C.-X., Sung, H. J., 2002. Drag reduction by spanwise wall oscillation in wall-bounded turbulent flows. AIAA J. 40 (5), 842-850] and later studied by Quadrio and Ricco [Quadrio, M., Ricco, P., 2004. Critical assessment of turbulent drag reduction through spanwise wall oscillations. J. Fluid Mech. 521, 251-271], has been found through physical arguments pertaining to the action of the oscillating Stokes layer on the near-wall turbulence dynamics. The predictive potential of the scaling parameter is exploited to gain insight into the drag-reducing effects of the oscillating-wall technique. The period of oscillation which guarantees the maximum drag reduction for a given maximum wall displacement is studied for the first time. The issue of the minimum intensity of wall forcing required to produce a non-zero drag reduction effect and the dependence of the drag reduction on the Reynolds number are also addressed. The drag reduction data available in the literature are compared with the prediction given by the scaling parameter, thus attaining a comprehensive view of the state of the art. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available