4.5 Article

Comparison of intrapartum outcome among immigrant women from Ethiopia and the general obstetric population in Israel

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS
Volume 118, Issue 2, Pages 161-165

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.02.018

Keywords

Ethiopians; Immigrants; Intrapartum outcome; Operative delivery

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To compare intrapartum outcome between ethnic Ethiopian women and the general obstetric population in Israel. Methods: In a retrospective study, computerized data from all Ethiopian women who delivered between January 2004 and August 2011 at a university teaching hospital in Afula, Israel, were assessed. The control group comprised non-Ethiopian Israeli women, who were matched at a ratio of 1:2 on the basis of deliveries that took place immediately before and after delivery by an Ethiopian woman. The primary outcome was incidence of operative delivery. Results: During the study period, 576 Ethiopian women delivered along with 1152 matched control women. Ethiopian women had a higher incidence of pre-eclampsia (6.8% versus 4.0%, P = 0.01) and early postpartum hemorrhage (4.3% versus 1.6%, P = 0.003) than control women. After adjustment for potential confounders, the incidence of vacuum or cesarean delivery was significantly higher among Ethiopian than among control women (odds ratio, 1.68; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-2.20; P = 0.002). The incidence of composite major perinatal morbidity, including Erb palsy and cord pH less than 7.1, tended to be higher among Ethiopian women than among control women (2.3% versus 1.1%; P = 0.053). Conclusion: Although prepartum and intrapartum care are standardized, Ethiopian women had a less favorable intrapartum outcome. (C) 2012 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available