4.5 Article

Performance of a computer-based assessment of cognitive function measures in two cohorts of seniors

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY
Volume 28, Issue 12, Pages 1239-1250

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/gps.3949

Keywords

cognitive function; clinical trial; performance measures

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health/National Institute on Aging Cooperative Agreement [UO1 AG22376]
  2. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute [3U01AG022376-05A2S]
  3. National Institute on Aging, NIH

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundComputer-administered assessment of cognitive function is being increasingly incorporated in clinical trials; however, its performance in these settings has not been systematically evaluated. DesignThe Seniors Health and Activity Research Program pilot trial (N=73) developed a computer-based tool for assessing memory performance and executive functioning. The Lifestyle Interventions and Independence for Elders investigators incorporated this battery in a full-scale multicenter clinical trial (N=1635). We describe relationships that test scores have with those from interviewer-administered cognitive function tests and risk factors for cognitive deficits and describe performance measures (completeness, intraclass correlations [ICC]). ResultsComputer-based assessments of cognitive function had consistent relationships across the pilot and full-scale trial cohorts with interviewer-administered assessments of cognitive function, age, and a measure of physical function. In the Lifestyle Interventions and Independence for Elders cohort, their external validity was further demonstrated by associations with other risk factors for cognitive dysfunction: education, hypertension, diabetes, and physical function. Acceptable levels of data completeness (>83%) were achieved on all computer-based measures; however, rates of missing data were higher among older participants (odds ratio=1.06 for each additional year; p<0.001) and those who reported no current computer use (odds ratio=2.71; p<0.001). ICCs among clinics were at least as low (ICC <0.013) as for interviewer measures (ICC<0.023), reflecting good standardization. All cognitive measures loaded onto the first principal component (global cognitive function), which accounted for 40% of the overall variance. ConclusionOur results support the use of computer-based tools for assessing cognitive function in multicenter clinical trials of older individuals. Copyright (c) 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available