4.5 Article

Chewing problems are associated with depression in the elderly: results from the InCHIANTI study

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY
Volume 29, Issue 3, Pages 236-244

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/gps.3995

Keywords

chewing problems; depression; elderly; epidemiology

Funding

  1. Italian Ministry of Health [ICS110.1/RF97.71]
  2. US National Institute on Aging [263 MD 9164, 263 MD 821336]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectiveDepression is increasingly recognized in older populations and associated with undernutrition, disability, and increased mortality. Chewing problems (CPs) share with depression these associations. The aim of the study was to evaluate the association, if any, between CPs and depression in older subjects. MethodsWe assessed 927 participants aged 65years and older, derived from the InCHIANTI' study. Mood was evaluated using the CES-D scale and defined depressed by a CES-D score 20. CPs were self-reported. Logistic regression was performed to assess the adjusted association between depression and CPs. The adjusted model was analyzed after stratifying for use of complete, partial dentures and edentulism. ResultsChewing problems were reported by 293/927 (31.6%) participants. Depression was present in 188/927(20.3%) participants. In multivariable logistic regression, CPs were associated with depression (OR=1.81, 95% CI=1.26-2.58; p=0.001). No significant association was found among subjects who used complete dentures (OR=1.12, 95% CI=0.80-1.58, p=0.515). Up to 27.8% of prevalent depression might be attributed to CPs. ConclusionsChewing problems are associated with depression in elderly population. Use of complete dentures hinder this association. Older depressed subjects should be screened for the presence of CPs; further studies are needed to evaluate the impact of early detection and correction of CPs on the development of depression. Copyright (c) 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available