4.7 Article

High hydrostatic pressure processing reduces Salmonella enterica serovars in diced and whole tomatoes

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 149, Issue 2, Pages 113-117

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.05.024

Keywords

Tomatoes; Salmonella; High pressure processing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fresh and fresh-cut tomatoes have been associated with numerous outbreaks of salmonellosis in recent years. One effective post harvest treatment to reduce Salmonella enterica in tomatoes may be high pressure processing (HPP). The objectives of the study were to determine the potential for HPP to reduce S. enterica serovars Newport, Javiana. Braenderup and Anatum in tryptic soy broth (TSB) and to determine the effect of HPP to reduce the most pressure resistant of the four serovars from fresh diced and whole tomatoes. To evaluate pressure resistance, TSB containing 8 log CFU/ml of one of the four serovars was packaged in sterile stomacher bags and subjected to one of three different pressures (350, 450 or 550 MPa) for 120 s. The most pressure resistant S. enterica serovar evaluated was Braenderup. Subjecting the broth culture to 350, 450 and 550 MPa resulted in a 4.53, 5.74 and 7.09 log reduction in S. Braenderup, respectively. Diced tomatoes (150 g) and whole red round tomatoes (approximately 150g) were inoculated with 0.1 ml of 9.1 log CFU/ml S. Braenderup, and subjected to the same pressure treatments (350,450 or 550 MPa). Significant reductions of S. Braenderup concentrations in diced tomatoes (P<0.05) were seen after processing at 350 (0.46 CFU/g), 450 (1.44 log CFU/g), and 550 MPa (3.67 log CFU/g). In whole tomatoes, significant reductions (P<0.05) were also seen at 350 (1.41 log CFU/g), 450 (2.25 log CFU/g) and 550 MPa (3.35 log CFU/g). HPP may be an effective post harvest strategy to reduce low levels of S. enterica contamination in whole and diced tomatoes. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available