Effects of study precision and risk of bias in networks of interventions: a network meta-epidemiological study
Published 2013 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Effects of study precision and risk of bias in networks of interventions: a network meta-epidemiological study
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 42, Issue 4, Pages 1120-1131
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Online
2013-06-29
DOI
10.1093/ije/dyt074
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Single-Center Trials Show Larger Treatment Effects Than Multicenter Trials: Evidence From a Meta-epidemiologic Study
- (2013) Agnes Dechartres et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- A fully Bayesian application of the Copas selection model for publication bias extended to network meta-analysis
- (2012) Dimitris Mavridis et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Accounting for correlation in network meta-analysis with multi-arm trials
- (2012) A. J. Franchini et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Indirect and mixed-treatment comparison, network, or multiple-treatments meta-analysis: many names, many benefits, many concerns for the next generation evidence synthesis tool
- (2012) Georgia Salanti Research Synthesis Methods
- Using network meta-analysis to evaluate the existence of small-study effects in a network of interventions
- (2012) Anna Chaimani et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Detecting and adjusting for small-study effects in meta-analysis
- (2011) Gerta Rücker et al. BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL
- Adjusting for publication biases across similar interventions performed well when compared with gold standard data
- (2011) Santiago G. Moreno et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Different methods of allocation to groups in randomized trials are associated with different levels of bias. A meta-epidemiological study
- (2011) Peter Herbison et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Relative oral corticosteroid-sparing effect of 7 inhaled corticosteroids in chronic asthma: a meta-analysis
- (2010) Anwar K. Abdullah et al. ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY
- Estimation and adjustment of bias in randomized evidence by using mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis
- (2010) S. Dias et al. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY
- Assessment of regression-based methods to adjust for publication bias through a comprehensive simulation study
- (2009) Santiago G Moreno et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- A case study of multiple-treatments meta-analysis demonstrates that covariates should be considered
- (2009) Georgia Salanti et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Addressing between-study heterogeneity and inconsistency in mixed treatment comparisons: Application to stroke prevention treatments in individuals with non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation
- (2009) Nicola J. Cooper et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Models for potentially biased evidence in meta-analysis using empirically based priors
- (2008) N. J. Welton et al. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY
- Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study
- (2008) Lesley Wood et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreFind the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
Search