4.5 Article

Experimental study of recompression reaction for low-load operation in direct-injection homogeneous charge compression ignition engines with n-heptane and i-octane fuels

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINE RESEARCH
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages 215-229

Publisher

PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1243/14680874JER03309

Keywords

HCCI; low-load HCCI; NVO; recompression reaction; reforming reaction; pilot injection; split injection

Funding

  1. US Department of Energy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Experiments have been reported in the literature in which the low-load limit of a retention-mode HCCI engine operating on gasoline has been significantly extended by preprocessing of the fuel during negative valve overlap. This paper presents experimental studies in which this low-load-limit extension is demonstrated and characterized using simple, single-component hydrocarbon fuels with relatively well-known chemical kinetics. The model fuels were n-heptane and i-octane and this choice was made both because of the extensive work that has been undertaken to develop their chemical kinetic mechanisms and because these fuels span the range of ignitability that is likely to be of interest for HCCI engines. The experimental results reported here show that both fuels exhibit load extension to as low as 1 bar net indicated mean effective pressure when operated at high residual mass fractions, low equivalence ratios, and an appropriate choice of compression ratio (13 for n-heptane, 18 for i-octane). Near the low-load limit, combustion is stable, exhibits slightly advanced timing, has relatively low unburned hydrocarbon emissions, negligible (< 5 ppm) NO emissions, and slightly increased CO, emissions (compared to higher load conditions). The indicated efficiency of low-load operation with recompression reaction is somewhat reduced, mainly due to increased heat transfer and decreased combustion efficiency.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available