4.5 Article

Differential expression of p53 and p504s in hyperplastic polyp, sessile serrated adenoma and traditional serrated adenoma

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE
Volume 25, Issue 10, Pages 1193-1200

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00384-010-1007-5

Keywords

Traditional-serrated adenoma; Sessile serrated adenoma; Hyperplastic polyp; P504S (AMACR) immunostain; p53 immunostain

Funding

  1. National Institute for Health Research [ACF-2008-21-005] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Known collectively as serrated polyps, hyperplastic polyps (HP), sessile serrated adenomas (SSA/SSP) and traditional serrated adenoma (TSA) may represent a spectrum of increasing malignant potential with characteristic immunological markers. There is increasing evidence that HP, SSA/SSP and TSA are biologically different and are likely to represent a spectrum along the serrated polyp pathway. Although there is general consensus about the diagnostic features of serrated polyps, the morphological differences between the categories are often subtle. This study compares the expression of p53 and P504S among serrated polyps. Sixty seven randomly selected biopsies (n = 59) and resection specimens (n = 8) histologically diagnosed for SSA/SSP, TSA and HP (19, 30 and 18 specimens, respectively) were obtained. There was a significant difference in p53 (P < 0.001) and P504S (P < 0.001) immunopositivity and distribution among the serrated polyps. In particular, there is diffuse expression p53 and P504S in TSA compared to HP and SSA/SSP where p53 and P504S expression was more frequently confined to the lower 1/3 of the crypts. In addition, percentage of cells expressing p53 and p504S expression was higher in TSA than those of HP and SSA/SSP. Immunostains, p53 and P504S, may be useful adjuncts to morphological diagnosis of serrated polyps.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available