4.7 Article

Evaluation of the reservoir permeability of anthracite coals by geophysical logging data

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL GEOLOGY
Volume 87, Issue 2, Pages 121-127

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.coal.2011.06.001

Keywords

Anthracite coals; Coal permeability; Coal reservoir model; Geophysical logging; Resistivity; Cementation index

Funding

  1. National Major Research Program for Science and Technology of China [2011ZX05034-001]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2009CB219604]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40972107]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2010ZY04, 2011YXL030]
  5. Petro-China Innovation Foundation [2010D-5006-0101]
  6. PCSIRT [IRT0864]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Permeability is one of the most significant reservoir parameters. It is commonly obtained by experiment, history simulation, injection/falloff well test and geophysical logging. Among these, geophysical logging remains as the most economic and efficient technique in evaluating coal permeability in the vicinity of an open-hole. In this paper, geophysical logging data are used to evaluate the coal reservoir permeability for the No. 3 coal seam in the southern Qinshui Basin (Fanzhuang and Zhengzhuang coal zones). Ideally coal reservoirs consist of coal matrix and fracture networks that can be represented by a model called a collection of sheets. Based on the model, coal reservoir permeability can be quantitatively calculated using the theoretical formula of k(f) = 8.50 x 10(-4) w(2)phi(f), in which fracture width (w) and fracture porosity (phi(f)) were obtained by dual laterolog and density logging data, respectively. Calculative results show that coal reservoir permeability ranged from 0.017 mD to 0.617 mD for the Fanzhuang coal zone and from 0.047 mD to 1.337 mD for the Zhengzhuang coal zone. The permeability decreases with coal burial depth, reflecting variations in penetration capability of coal reservoirs at varying depths. Comparing results with those from injection/falloff well tests, however, shows that the model-calculated permeability is slightly higher. This is expected because the model did not include the influence from coal anisotropy. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available