4.3 Article

Long-term (≥2 years) follow-up optical coherence tomographic study after sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation: comparison to 9-month follow-up results

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING
Volume 27, Issue 6, Pages 875-881

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10554-010-9729-6

Keywords

Stent; Optical coherence tomography

Funding

  1. Ministry for Health, Welfare & Family Affairs, Republic of Korea [A085012, A102064]
  2. Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea [A085136]
  3. Cardiovascular Research Center, Seoul, Korea

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many studies have demonstrated that late or very late thrombosis after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation may be related with incomplete neointimal coverage. We investigated long-term (a parts per thousand yen2 years) results of neointimal coverage following sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) implantation using optical coherence tomography (OCT). A follow-up angiography with OCT examination was performed in 29 patients with 32 lesions for more than 2 years (group 1; 1,066 +/- A 381 days) and 101 patients with 104 lesions at 9 months (group 2; 273 +/- A 33 days) after the index procedure. The status of neointimal coverage and stent apposition was evaluated. The number of stents with completely covered struts was higher (25.0% in group 1 vs. 13.5% in group 2, P = 0.12). The percentage of uncovered struts (5.4 +/- A 7.5% in group 1 vs. 8.5 +/- A 11.6% in group 2, P = 0.19) and that of malapposed strut (0.5 +/- A 1.4% vs. 1.5 +/- A 4.2%, respectively, P = 0.19) were lower in group 1. While the percentage of uncovered and malapposed struts were quite similar in the PES groups between the two groups (P = 0.54 and 0.65, respectively), there were lower trends in the percentage of uncovered and malapposed struts in the SES group (P = 0.09 and 0.09, respectively). In conclusion, incomplete neointimal coverage was still observed in a majority of DESs and considerable struts were not covered with neointima even at more than 2 years after DES implantation. The pattern of neointimal coverage between 9-month and 2-year appeared to be somewhat different between PES and SES.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available