4.6 Review

Use of vitamins C and E as a prophylactic therapy to prevent postoperative atrial fibrillation

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 138, Issue 3, Pages 221-228

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2009.04.043

Keywords

Postoperative atrial fibrillation; Ischemia/reperfusion; Oxidative stress; Vitamin C; Vitamin E

Funding

  1. FONDECYT [1070948]
  2. Procaps Laboratory (Colombia)
  3. Gynopharm CFR Laboratory (Chile)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Oxidative stress has been strongly involved in the underlying mechanism of atrial fibrillation, particularly in the arrhythmia occurring in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with extracorporeal circulation (postoperative atrial fibrillation). The ischemia/reperfusion injury thus occurring in the myocardial tissue contributes to the development of tissue remodeling, thought to be responsible for the functional heart impairment. Consequently, structural changes due to the cardiac tissue biomolecules attack by reactive oxygen and/or nitrogen species could account for functional changes in ion channels, transporters, membrane conductance, cytosolic transduction signals, and other events, all associated with the occurrence of arrhythmic consequences. The lack of success and significant side effects of anti-arrhythmic drugs have given rise to attempts aimed to develop alternative novel pharmacologic treatments. On this line, the biological properties of the antioxidant vitamins C and E suggest that they could decrease the vulnerability of the heart to the oxidative damage. Nevertheless, very few studies to assess their anti-arrhythmic effects have been reported in humans. The clinical and experimental evidence supporting the view that the pharmacological use of antioxidant vitamins could contribute to prevent postoperative atrial fibrillation is presented. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available