4.5 Article

Three-dimensional morphological analysis of C-shaped canals in mandibular first premolars in a Chinese population

Journal

INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL
Volume 45, Issue 11, Pages 1035-1041

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2012.02070.x

Keywords

classification; C-shaped root canal; mandibular first premolar; micro-CT; radicular groove

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81070821]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fan B, Ye W, Xie E, Wu H, Gutmann JL. Three-dimensional morphological analysis of C-shaped canals in mandibular first premolars in a Chinese population. International Endodontic Journal,similar to 45, 1035-1041, 2012. Abstract Aim To investigate and compare the unique anatomical features and positioning of C-shaped canals in mandibular first premolars with and without radicular grooves in a Chinese population. Methodology A total of 327 extracted mandibular first premolars including 146 with radicular grooves and 181 without radicular grooves from a Chinese population were scanned by mu CT-50 or mu CT-80. After reconstruction, canal systems were classified according to a modified Vertucci method and the anatomical features evaluated. The data were analysed by one-way anova test, Chi-square test and Fishers exact test (P < 0.05). Results Of 146 mandibular first premolars with a radicular groove, 97 had C-shaped canals, the predominant anatomical canal type being Vb (P < 0.001), which was characterized by an oval canal in the coronal part and a semicolon or continuous C-shape beneath the groove. Of the 181 mandibular first premolars without a radicular groove, no C-shaped canal system was observed, and the percentage of Ia (97.8%) was significantly higher than those of other types (P < 0.001). Conclusion In teeth from a Chinese population, mandibular first premolars with radicular grooves had a high incidence of C-shaped canal systems with anatomical variations along the root.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available