4.7 Article

A parametric study of AC electrothermal flow in microchannels with asymmetrical interdigitated electrodes

Journal

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2010.11.004

Keywords

AC electroosmosis; AC electrothermal flow; Asymmetric interdigitated electrodes; Numerical simulation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50706026]
  2. Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission [08JC1411100]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the AC electrothermal (ACET) flow in a microchannel with asymmetrical planar electrode pairs, in the same configuration as an AC electroosmosis (ACEO) pump, is studied numerically. The electrical, temperature and velocity fields in the microchannel are obtained by solving the coupled electrical, momentum and energy equations. The effects of electrode size, gap and length ratios, electrical conductivity of electrolyte solution, thermal conductivity of microchannel base material, as well as voltage and the frequency of AC on ACET flow are investigated in details. It is found that in the operating frequency range of the ACE pump, i.e. 100 Hz-100 kHz, the velocity of the ACET flow is frequency-independent and moves in the same direction as the ACE flow, and effects of electrode size, gap and length ratios on flow velocity have the same trend as the ACEO flow. Because the ACET flow velocity is proportional to electrical conductivities of electrolyte solution linearly and to the fourth power of the applied voltage, while the ACEO flow velocity decreases with the increase of electrical conductivity of the electrolyte solution and is only proportional to the square of applied voltage, therefore the ACET flow should not be neglected in an ACE pump for the cases of high conductivity of electrolyte solution and relatively high AC voltage where ACE and ACET effects are comparable. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available