4.6 Article

Sulfate reduction and trichloroethylene biodegradation by a marine microbial community from hydrothermal vents sediments

Journal

INTERNATIONAL BIODETERIORATION & BIODEGRADATION
Volume 65, Issue 1, Pages 116-123

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2010.10.004

Keywords

Sulfate reduction; Biodegradation; Hydrothermal vents; Trichloroethylene; Thermophilic

Funding

  1. National Council of Science and Technology in Mexico (CONACYT) [82627, 242656]
  2. Distrito Federal's Institute of Science and Technology (ICYT) [PICS08-79]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sulfate reduction (SR) and trichloroethylene (TCE) biodegradation at two different temperatures (37 and 70 degrees C) were investigated in enrichment cultures prepared with two different samples of sediments collected from hydrothermal vents. The unadapted sediments were incubated with sulfate (4 g L-1) as the electron acceptor before ICE addition to enrich them in biomass and to establish a constant sulfate reduction (SR, 87% sulfate conversion and specific H2S concentration of 90.81 +/- 8.19 mg H2S g VSS-1), afterwards TCE was added at an initial concentration of 300 mu mol L-1. The best results for TCE biodegradation were obtained at 37 degrees C. At this temperature, SR was up to 92%, whereas TCE biodegradation reached 75% and ethane was detected as the main degradation product. Under thermophilic conditions (70 degrees C) TCE biodegradation reached up to approximately 60% and the SR was 30% in 30 days of incubation with the chlorinated solvent. Along with these results, the 165 rDNA analysis from samples at 37 degrees C showed the presence of bacteria belonging to the genera: Clostridium, Bacillus and Desulfuromonas. The overall results on TCE degradation and SR suggest that cometabolic ICE degradation is carried out by sulfate or sulfur reducers and fermentative bacteria at mesophilic conditions. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available